What needs attention first?
Important signals compete with noise, and every person reads the situation differently.
A seven-business-day engagement to understand one recurring decision, prototype its critical interaction and plan what comes next. The timeline begins after confirmed kickoff and receipt of required inputs.
[01]The problem
The Sprint is useful when a recurring report, workflow, dashboard, internal tool, or AI idea creates friction instead of making the next action clearer.
Important signals compete with noise, and every person reads the situation differently.
Data is visible, but relationships, thresholds, ownership, and context remain hidden.
The workflow stops at insight instead of helping someone make and carry out a decision.
[02]Understand the workflow
The Sprint focuses on the decision, the information people need and the handoffs around it. A prototype makes the critical interaction concrete enough to review before committing to a build.
Metrics are available across reports and spreadsheets.
People can see the numbers, but not what deserves attention first.
A prioritized decision view with drivers, thresholds, and next actions.
Annotated decision view[03]Seven-day plan
Confirm the decision, users, inputs, consequence, and success condition.
Trace the current workflow and its handoffs.
Isolate where attention, ownership, or trust breaks down.
Prototype the critical workflow change.
Compare the strongest direction against the evidence.
Prioritize what to build, defer, and bound around AI or automation.
Prototype walkthrough and handoff session
[04]What you receive
You leave with a mapped decision path, a focused interactive prototype, and a prioritized build plan.
One decision area, the people involved, the inputs, and what happens when it fails.
A clear view of the workflow, reporting path, handoffs, and breakdown points.
What to fix now, what can wait, and what should be ignored.
A focused interactive prototype of the critical workflow, using connected screens and realistic states for review, stakeholder alignment and implementation guidance.
A practical next-build plan with AI, data, and human-review notes where relevant.
A concise record of the recommended direction and one consolidated review round.
[05]Relevant proof
My strongest visible proof comes from enterprise analytics, supply-chain reporting, B2B SaaS, and complex operational workflows.
Designed reporting and reusable patterns with product, data, BI and engineering teams across retail measurement, inventory, supply chain and vendor performance.
Proposify experience spanning creation, editing, pricing, electronic signatures, audit trails, and customer workflows.
Recent contract work focused on reporting and permissions. Independent practice includes procurement prototyping and financial-information workflow design.
[06]Fit and boundaries
For business owners and product teams with one recurring workflow to improve, access to the people who use it, and a decision-maker ready to participate.
Looking for a website, a broader product engagement or implementation support? We can discuss a separate scope.
[07]Investment
Starting at CAD $5,000 plus applicable taxes, the seven-business-day Sprint covers focused intake, current-state mapping, prioritized findings, one focused interactive prototype, an implementation roadmap, a decision memo and one consolidated review round. Larger scopes are quoted separately.
[08]Questions
No. Supply chain is a strong proof anchor, but the Sprint is organized around an operating pattern: one recurring decision involving several people or information sources. It can apply to B2B software and established operational businesses.
Yes, when the workflow is recurring and consequential, a decision-maker can participate, usable inputs exist, and the business can support the starting investment.
No. You receive one focused interactive prototype with realistic states for validation and implementation planning. Production code, deployment, backend integration and full-product development require a separate scope and quote.
The Sprint covers one primary workflow and one consolidated review round. Its prototype may include connected screens or states needed to evaluate that workflow. Additional workflows or review rounds are quoted separately.
A decision-maker, the people closest to the workflow, and sanitized examples or a walkthrough of the current process. Confirm who uses it, the decision it should support and what happens when it fails. The timeline starts after confirmed kickoff and receipt of the required inputs.
[09]Start here
Share who uses it, what decision they need to make and where the current process gets in the way. I will help assess whether the Sprint is the right starting point.